Re: What did you do? (Why standards exist)

Subject: Re: What did you do? (Why standards exist)
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:27:57 -0700

And this is customary in many organizations where the implemented processes
are counterproductive make work projects that are unable to solve the
doumentation problems that inspired the adoption of the process.


On Tuesday, 23 August 2016, deloaa <deloaa -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

> ISO requires that a process be repeatable. ISO neither requires that a
> process be of a high quaility nor does it require that the documentation
> describing said process be well written.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Previous by Author: Re: Facebook question
Next by Author: Sickening stuff from Engineers
Previous by Thread: RE: Generic XSLTs for extracting / hiding documentation embedded in XML?
Next by Thread: Re: What did you do? (Why standards exist)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads