RE: Proposal for a Stack Exchange site for Documentation

[<mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com>]

Stack Exchange already has a site for English grammar and usage, so those questions can be deferred there. This is actually one of the virtues of the Stack Exchange network, that it has places to send off-topic questions. Helps keep things a little cleaner in each site.

 

Mark

 

From: Tony Chung [mailto:tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca] 
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 9:39 AM
To: mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Proposal for a Stack Exchange site for Documentation

 

As long as categories are fluid and can be easily segmented so technical issues, style and grammar issues, production issues, and other types of issues could be separated and spun off when needed, stack overflow should be a good exercise. 

 

-Tony


On Sunday, 24 July 2016, <mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com');> > wrote:

There has been a proposal made to create a Stack Exchange site for
Documentation. Considering the impact that Stack Overflow has had on the way
technical information is created and shared, I think every technical writer
should be aware of how it works, and having out own site seems like the
perfect way to learn how it works. Not to mention that it could help raise
the profile of the profession among stack exchange users, which would be no
bad thing.
<http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/101439/documentation?referrer=GTZ <http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/101439/documentation?referrer=GTZJ5sVYXPGMTJXchGF6KA2> 
J5sVYXPGMTJXchGF6KA2>
http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/101439/documentation?referrer=GTZJ <http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/101439/documentation?referrer=GTZJ5sVYXPGMTJXchGF6KA2> 
5sVYXPGMTJXchGF6KA2



Have a look and add your votes and sample questions for the site.



Mark

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca <mailto:tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> .

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> 


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com <mailto:admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com> . Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives