TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Washington Post style guide from 1970s? From:<mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com> To:"'Robert Lauriston'" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>, "'TECHWR-L Writing'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:44:55 -0500
Cool. What search terms did you use? I'm always interested in how different
people have different approaches to search and achieve different results. I
tried several formulations but got nothing remotely close, so I'm keen to
know what worked.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
Of Robert Lauriston
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:36 PM
To: TECHWR-L Writing
Subject: Re: Washington Post style guide from 1970s?
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:16 PM, <mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com> wrote:
> That's the sort of question it is very hard to Google for. Google is
> much better at finding information than documents.
>
> The first thing I would try is to ask on the English Language and
> Usage Stack Exchange: http://english.stackexchange.com/
>
> ark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
> Behalf Of Michael Wyland
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 7:05 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Washington Post style guide from 1970s?
>
> To all:
>
> I'm looking to document trivia I know to be true because I lived through
it.
>
> In the mid-1970s, the Washington Post revised its style manual to mandate
> the dropping of the second "e" in words like "employee" and "trustee."
For
> a time, "employe" and "truste" were used in all Washington Post news
> articles and features. The Post's ombudsman wrote a column decrying
> the silliness of the change. After a time (months? a couple of
> years?) the style manual was revised again to once again allow words
> ending in "ee" to be so spelled in the newspaper.
>
> Question: how best to find the documents? I've done Google searches
> and, as yet, have been unable to find archived copies of the style
> guide. I'll go looking for the ombudsman's column, but I can't remember
his name. Ideas?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Michael L. Wyland
> Sumption & Wyland
> 818 South Hawthorne Avenue
> Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104-4537
> (605) 336-0244 or (888) 4-SUMPTION
>
> Celebrating our 25th Anniversary - 1990-2015
>
> Web site: http://www.sumptionandwyland.com LinkedIn Profile:
>http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelwyland
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> and content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> and content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as robert -at- lauriston -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
content development | http://techwhirl.com
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com