Re: Leading and Bleeding Edge?

Subject: Re: Leading and Bleeding Edge?
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Lonie McMichael <loniemc -at- gmail -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:54:18 -0800

A "leading edge" in document authoring would be a clearly identifiable direction that everyone either is moving or wants to move, and as you can see from the range of responses here, there isn't one. The tools being offered as possible "leading edge" choices really represent a veritable soup of "bleeding edges," because the lack of consensus on a standard means that they're all potential candidates to become the next Interleaf or Ventura.

Gene Kim-Eng

On 1/4/2016 8:42 AM, Lonie McMichael wrote:

be writing reports on leading and bleeding edge technologies technical
writers used to CREATE publications and documentation.

Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Leading and Bleeding Edge?: From: Lonie McMichael

Previous by Author: Re: Leading and Bleeding Edge?
Next by Author: TechWhirl Fast 5 - Documentation Tools for Small / Mid-Size Businesses (Jan 20)
Previous by Thread: Re: Leading and Bleeding Edge?
Next by Thread: RE: Leading and Bleeding Edge?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads