Re: SharePoint: versions and workflows

[Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>]

Could be the company invested in custom SP development that breaks if
they "upgrade" to a newer release.

Could just be the general large-organization resistance to upgrading
without a compelling reason.

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Can anyone venture a guess as to why my employerâa Fortune 500 company
> known as a "document company"âwould elect to deploy SharePoint Server 2007
> on any large-scale project? That is, are there valid reasons for having
> chosen SPS 2010 or 2013? Curious minds would like to know....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives