Re: SharePoint: versions and workflows

Subject: Re: SharePoint: versions and workflows
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:05:41 +0200

Could be the company invested in custom SP development that breaks if
they "upgrade" to a newer release.

Could just be the general large-organization resistance to upgrading
without a compelling reason.

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Can anyone venture a guess as to why my employerâa Fortune 500 company
> known as a "document company"âwould elect to deploy SharePoint Server 2007
> on any large-scale project? That is, are there valid reasons for having
> chosen SPS 2010 or 2013? Curious minds would like to know....
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

SharePoint: versions and workflows: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: Re: Font vs. Typeface
Next by Author: Re: what's the current trend?
Previous by Thread: SharePoint: versions and workflows
Next by Thread: Partial Screenshot Indicators

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads