TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
Subject:Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization? From:Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:21:49 -0700
"Authorization required" or "approval required" depending on the sequence.
I've never heard "four-eyes" and it sounds more like the two-person rule anyway.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Robert Fekete
<fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> In our setup, ... one of the users ... performs the action, and the other approves ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW