Re: Reality check: "mS" time increment?

Subject: Re: Reality check: "mS" time increment?
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:47:48 -0800

That conforms to no standard I know. I'd check with the author to make
sure they don't mean microsecond.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> When dealing with time increments (and noting the exact case used herein),
> is there such a thing as an mS value?
> (I believe it's an erroneous reference to milliseconds, which we all know
> as *ms*.)
Doc-To-Help: The Quickest Way to Author and Publish Online Help, Policy & Procedure Guides, eBooks, and more using Microsoft Word |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Reality check: "mS" time increment?: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: Re: Documenting program flow
Next by Author: Re: Shotguns (was: I'm furious...)
Previous by Thread: Reality check: "mS" time increment?
Next by Thread: Marketing and capitalization

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads