Re: $500 million for an error in a policy manual

Subject: Re: $500 million for an error in a policy manual
From: Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:43:48 -0800

They won't give a straight answer about how it happened but they wrote “ENSURE an organic absorbent (kitty litter) is added to the waste” when packaging drums of nitrate salt. I think this is a possible spell checker error. Someone may have mistyped, misspelled, or worse yet, misheard, "ENSURE inorganic absorbent..." and what got added to the new and spontaneous revision with no revision control were the directions for making a patented explosive.

On 12/11/2014 12:00 PM, Robert Lauriston wrote:

Writing "organic" in place of "inorganic" would certainly have been an
error, but I'm not sure that's properly classified as a typo,


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1pJ4zPa

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Do you use a "phablet" for writing and editing?
Next by Author: Re: Large Documents in Word
Previous by Thread: RE: $500 million for an error in a policy manual
Next by Thread: RE: $500 million for an error in a policy manual


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads