TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: 12 High-Paying Jobs For People Who Don't Like Math
Subject:RE: 12 High-Paying Jobs For People Who Don't Like Math From:"Cardimon, Craig" <ccardimon -at- M-S-G -dot- com> To:'Keith Hood' <bus -dot- write -at- gmail -dot- com>, "'shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com'" <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> Date:Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:53:54 +0000
"Getting a technical review from the SMEs usually took a court order, a squad of Marines, and the hand of God squashing something nearby to make the point."
Now THAT's funny!
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Keith Hood
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:41 PM
To: shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com
Cc: techwrl
Subject: Re: 12 High-Paying Jobs For People Who Don't Like Math
Really? When did that happen? My comment was meant to indicate I had never worked in places where documentation was likely to include a lot of calculations, like load bearing. I've always been expected to have to do a lot of fact checking. Getting a technical review from the SMEs usually took a court order, a squad of Marines, and the hand of God squashing something nearby to make the point.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> wrote:
> >I've never worked on anything involving aircraft, space, flight, or
> ballistics.
>
> And in situations like that, it is *never* the tech writer's job to
> confirm the math or other values for accuracy. The SMEs should be the
> only people to sign-off copy.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Keith Hood <bus -dot- write -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>
>> My experience is very similar to Shawn's. In every job I've ever
>> had, math has always been an extremely *tiny* part of the work.
>> Every now and then I may need to check formulae, like in an
>> installation guide where it shows how to calculate the amount of disk
>> space needed for a software package and the log files that are
>> produced during operation. I've never worked on anything involving
>> aircraft, space, flight, or ballistics. I've also never had to work with engineering analyses.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Shawn <shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think there is some confusion about what tech writing is all about.
>>>
>>> Tech writing and tech writers are as diverse as the whole field of
>>> writing.
>>> My experiences:
>>> - Documentation where my sole responsibility was to describe
>>> products, their actions, and customer interactions. Absolutely no math required.
>>> - Documentation which was simply a 'prettier' regurgitation of
>>> engineer's writing. Absolutely no math required.
>>> - For a while I worked for a statistical software company. In order
>>> to write up valid exercises, I did require rudimentary knowledge in
>>> stats (first time this part of my university education was
>>> recalled). Some stats math was required.
>>> - My current tech writing job is more do-it-yourself work where I am
>>> responsible for interpreting technical notes and self-discovering
>>> the equipment and software. Some general arithmetic/math is helpful.
>>> BTW, I was hired for my current position mainly because I have a
>>> highly technical background.
>>>
>>> So, to claim that tech writers require or do not require math is
>>> quite a generalization because this field is quite diverse. However,
>>> there are commonalities such as... we are all creative, problem
>>> solvers with an interest in taking something relatively complex and
>>> breaking it down, organizing the information, and making it easy to
>>> understand to different target audiences. Oh yes, we enjoy writing!
>>> That is essential! :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Where does one find the technical writing job where math isn't
>>> required?
>>> > I've never had one.
>>> >
>>> > Gene Kim-Eng
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 12/24/2013 12:09 PM, Craig Cardimon wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Interesting. Note Job #1.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.chron.com/jobs/article/12-High-Paying-Jobs-
>>> >> For-People-Who-Don-t-Like-Math-5088181.php
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> > New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor
>>> > for authoring.
>>> >
>>> > Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ
>>> >
>>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> >
>>> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as shawn -at- convergent -dot- io -dot-
>>> >
>>> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>>> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>>> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more
>>> > resources
>>> and
>>> > info.
>>> >
>>> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to
>>> > our
>>> online
>>> > magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>>> >
>>> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
>>> > public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Shawn Connelly*
>>> Technical writer
>>> shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com
>>> <http://www.cohodata.com> <https://twitter.com/cohodata>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1490 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC, V6H 1H5
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp
>>> enhancements, and more. Read all about it.
>>>
>>> Learn more: http://bit.ly/NNcWqS
>>>
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as bus -dot- write -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>>> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>>>
>>>
>>> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>>> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
>>> and info.
>>>
>>> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
>>> online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>>>
>>> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
>>> public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Shawn Connelly*
> Technical writer
> shawn -at- cohodata -dot- com
> <http://www.cohodata.com> <https://twitter.com/cohodata>
>
> 1490 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC, V6H 1H5
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp enhancements, and more. Read all about it.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do not read, distribute or reproduce this transmission (including any attachments). If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or email reply.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp enhancements, and more. Read all about it.
