Thank you (was RE: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know

Subject: Thank you (was RE: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
From: "Elissa K. Miller" <emiller -at- doubleknot -dot- com>
To: "techwrl" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:34:18 -0800

Hi, all:



I usually say this in a deadpan snarky way but I mean this without any snark
and with genuine gratitude: Thank you for your input. The degree to which
this stupid project is eating my lunch is embarrassing.



I will keep the glossary in general, remove the terms that are never
mentioned in the text in the first place (goodbye, USB), and add some
product-related context to establish relevance of the general terms that
remain.



Thank you for your help!



--Elissa





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Previous by Author: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Next by Author: RE: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Previous by Thread: Have you used...
Next by Thread: TechWhirl: Technical Communication Recap for December 20, 2013


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads