TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: encrypt before saving to the sky (was "Google Drive or Dropbox for document…)
Subject:Re: encrypt before saving to the sky (was "Google Drive or Dropbox for document…) From:David Crosswell <davidcrosswell -at- internode -dot- on -dot- net> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:40:04 +1000
On 21/04/13 17:11, Phil03 wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2013, at 11:54, "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> wrote:
>> If you can work on stuff locally, and encrypt it before saving to the sky, the Dropbox (or other) people can't mine your work and content, nor can their automated processes.
>>
> Thanks for that, Kevin. Anyone got recommendations for pre-upload encryption products?
>
> I just discovered TrueCrypt, here:
>
>http://www.truecrypt.org
>
> Can anyone offer any feedback on this or similar products?
TrueCrypt is good and has been reliable for some considerable time, but
, along with others, not considered 100% effective any longer.
There is some word of it being vulnerable to crack through hibernation
and possible RAM read, although I'm not completely au fait with the
situation as I haven't researched it as yet.
I can highly recommend Scrypt.
I'm not sure of its availability for Windows but if you are running
Debian or other open source software, it's readily available.
It's a simple password-based encryption utility which demonstrates the
scrypt key derivation function. On modern hardware and with default
parameters, the cost of cracking the password on a file encrypted by
scrypt enc is approximately 100 billion times more than the cost of
cracking the same password on a file encrypted by openssl enc; this
means that a five-character password using scrypt is stronger than a
ten-character password using openssl.
Cheers!
David.
>
>
> Best
> --
> Phil
>http://applehelpwriter.com
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/13xpg5n
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as davidcrosswell -at- internode -dot- on -dot- net -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
"Res publica non dominetur."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?