TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Graphics Resolution Confusion Once Again From:Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:09:56 -0800
What file format are using? That is, what is the file extension of the
graphic file?
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Nancy Allison <maker -at- verizon -dot- net> wrote:
> Hi, all. Can you help me with my current confusion about the behavior of
> resized graphics?
>
> My graphic is a screen shot and has these attributes:
>
> ---96 dpi resolution
> ---1141 px wide
> ---In inches, it is 11.885 inches wide
>
> I want to import it into a FrameMaker document with a 5" wide text column.
> I tried it two different ways:
>
> 1. I resized it when importing it into Frame by choosing a custom dpi of
> 235 dpi. Printed result is very high-resolution.
>
> 2. In Microsoft Office Picture Manager, I resized it to 42% of its original
> width, which gives me a picture 479 pixels wide, which at 96 dpi is just
> about 5 inches wide. I saved the file and imported it into FrameMaker at 96
> dpi. Printed result is jaggy and crude.
>
> In both cases the figure that is being imported is at 96 dpi, which is a
> crude resolution to start with. Why would resizing it in Office Pciture
> Manager give such a lousy result, while importing it into FrameMaker gives a
> good-quality result?
>
> Please feel free to refer me to previous threads or web sites where you
> know this topic is handled. I am sure it has been discussed to death. I'm
> sure I've asked related questions before. Unfortunately, I find it confusing
> and don't deal with it frequently enough for the explanations to stick.
> Maybe this time! I will try!
>
> --Nancy
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help.
> Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
> Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/salt.morton%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
