TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Pro's and Con's -- FrameMaker vs InDesign, TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 60, Issue 7
Subject:Re: Pro's and Con's -- FrameMaker vs InDesign, TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 60, Issue 7 From:Patryk Korman <patryk -dot- korman -at- native-instruments -dot- de> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:44:03 +0200
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 05:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Ken Poshedly<poshedly -at- bellsouth -dot- net>
> Subject: Pro's and Con's -- FrameMaker vs InDesign
> To: Techwr-l<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> Message-ID:<319930 -dot- 78899 -dot- qm -at- web180807 -dot- mail -dot- gq1 -dot- yahoo -dot- com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> The non-English-speaking engineers at my company's home offices in China use
> InDesign to produce non-English-language technical manuals for the company's
> line of heavy equipment. The company's group translators (all young
> 20-somethings) who have no real tech writing experience simply?use Word to
> produce English-language manuals. The layout and accuracy of technical matter
> and English is way below par because those kids simply have no access to the
> machines nor the technical expertise to explain things correctly nor enough
> English-language comprehension to do a good job. The company just wants books
> out on deadline.
> We -- a group of 3 tech writers -- here in the U.S. all come from extensive
> FrameMaker backgrounds (a combined total of 25 years), with technical expertise
> and obviously dern guud englsh. What we do is use those other "English-language"
> manuals from China (errors and all) to somehow perform miracles and produce
> well-arranged, more accurate and professional tech pubs (operation manuals,
> workshop manuals, parts books).
> I'm now hearing grumbling that the Chinese engineers who already use InDesign
> want us in the U.S. to move to InDesign. We are adamant that it's a bad move and
> our supervisor here and who knows nothing about this stuff wants solid
> arguements why we should stay with FrameMaker.
> We've compiled a list but I'd like to hear from y'all with your own ideas
> regarding ease of use, co$t, capability -- anything we can use in our corner.
> I've already posted this to the Frameusers list and the silence is deafening.
> Help anyone?
> -- Ken in metro Atlanta
InDesign can be a problem when it comes to migration of content,
especially when trying to get content back out of it for re-use,
translation in a tms (huge file sizes), and updating or rewriting in
Word. Other than that, it's a quite reliable and powerful tool. Just
don't try to xml with it.
If they do not have the need for migrating/re-using their content, I
guess the chances for you to make them change their work flows are
pretty low / make them learn FM next to nothing. Maybe you could
convince them to deliver the manuals in Word and you'd decide how to
proceed from there.
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-