TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Pro's and Con's -- FrameMaker vs InDesign From:Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:Techwr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:53:21 -0700
How big are the documents you're working with, and how much page layout
redesign are you doing vs editing and rewriting text? If the docs are
relatively small, doing them in ID might not be a bad idea. Adobe is
certainly doing more to improve it on an ongoing basis than they are with
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Ken Poshedly <poshedly -at- bellsouth -dot- net> wrote:
> I'm now hearing grumbling that the Chinese engineers who already use
> want us in the U.S. to move to InDesign. We are adamant that it's a bad
> move and
> our supervisor here and who knows nothing about this stuff wants solid
> arguements why we should stay with FrameMaker.
> We've compiled a list but I'd like to hear from y'all with your own ideas
> regarding ease of use, co$t, capability -- anything we can use in our
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-