TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Well, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. I'll gladly retract
that comment and offer "lob hollow sarcasm" in its place.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Porrello, Leonard
<lporrello -at- illumina -dot- com> wrote:
> "Speculate blindly"?
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Steven Jong <SteveFJong -at- comcast -dot- net>
> wrote:
>> We will require attestations from both the applicant and the
> applicant's client stating that the work presented is the applicant's
> and that is was satisfactory.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Swallow [mailto:techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:12 PM
> To: Porrello, Leonard
> Cc: Milan Davidovic; Steven Jong; TECHWR-L Digest
> Subject: Re: Certification: Ernest and Scribbler
>
> So long as you wish to continue to speculate blindly, I have no
> problem with entertaining topics concerning your mom.
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Porrello, Leonard
> <lporrello -at- illumina -dot- com> wrote:
>> Certification based on testimony. Brilliant. Will a note from mommy
> do?
>
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
