TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because... From:Janice Gelb <janice -dot- gelb -at- oracle -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:42:41 +1000
On Jun 22, 2010 10:45PM, Chris Despopoulos wrote:
> Vernacular brings up some reasoning behind anthropomorphism
> or systems. It makes active voice easier. As far as I can
> tell, active voice (generally agreed to be good, right?)
> equires an actor. YOU do x, y, and z. THE SYSTEM displays
> the foo dialog box.
Just want to note that active voice is important
when the actor is important. If the actor is not
important, then passive voice is acceptable. In
your example, it doesn't really matter that the
system is what displays the dialog box. Writing in
all active voice when documenting computer software
would result in a lot of redundancy as you would
always be repeating that "the program" or "the
system" were doing everything, which can pretty
much be taken for granted.
> Janice would say, "Ok, but you don't need to grant
> a system human qualities." True, but it's easier,
> and ultimately less demanding on the reader.[snip]
> So you *can* say "The system enters a wait state
> until you provide the foo." Or you can say "The
> system waits for a foo." You *can* say, "The
> system assembles the structures necessary to manage
> a foo", or you can say "The system expects a foo."
I have no problem with a system "waiting." I have a
problem with implying that the system *knows* it's
waiting ("expects," "anticipates"), tapping its
foot impatiently, no doubt :->
Janice Gelb | The only connection Oracle has with
janice -dot- gelb -at- oracle -dot- com | this message is the return address
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com/
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-