TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Information -- a working definition? From:Milan Davidović <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Richard Mateosian <xrmxrm -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:49:41 -0400
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Richard Mateosian <xrmxrm -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Why not just document what we do for a living and bypass the
> definitions?
Because they might come in handy when trying to discuss or explain
what we do? I'm thinking of the "create information" post that appears
to have inspired this thread.
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need. http://www.doctohelp.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-