TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Levels of Job Responsibility From:cewinch -at- aep -dot- com To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Fri, 21 May 2010 11:24:35 -0400
To be clear: I won't expect it in the book; I do realize they used
"Writer.". I was responding only to Dan's assertion that "writer" is the
"correct" way to put it. Correct for him--not so much for me. That's all
I'm saying. By no means do I wish to (re)start the title "war." :) As
Craig pointed out, we're a diverse lot, both in what we do and in what we
prefer to call ourselves. All I'd ask is that we all respect our different
preferences, even as we strongly hold our stong opinions. ;-)
~C
Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
05/21/2010 11:14 AM
To
<cewinch -at- aep -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
cc
Subject
RE: Levels of Job Responsibility
Sorry, but whether you're happy with the word "writer" or not, that's the
word that was used in the Occupational Outlook Handbook from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics, which was the specific context being discussed. Call
yourself "communicator" all you like, but don't expect to find that
description in the government labor statistics or most commercially
available salary surveys.
-Fred Ridder
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: Levels of Job Responsibility
> From: cewinch -at- aep -dot- com
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:54:56 -0400
>
> Whether we should be listed as TWs or TCs is a matter of opinion, and as
> everyone's mileage varies, it cannot be equally applied to all. I do
> almost no *writing* in this job, yet a I do a ton of communicating and
> ...of technical information. "Writer" is simply inaccurate for me, but
I'm
> definitely above "admin" and in a whole other category from any of the
> others the DOL used to lump us into. I'll stick with Communicator, thank
> you.
>
> ~C
> Connie Winch
> Technical Communicator
> American Electric Power
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
Hotmail. Get busy.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need. http://www.doctohelp.com/
- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-