Re: Beta documentation quality

Subject: Re: Beta documentation quality
From: Sally Derrick <sjd1201 -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: p -dot- vuncanon -at- att -dot- net
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:46:09 -0500

The 'criteria' I always seemed to get stuck with is write as fast as
possible before beta date and then pray that I at least had time to run
spell-check. The Beta watermark was always big and bold - mostly to make
sure everyone who saw it knew that I wasn't finished with that thing. The
word 'beta' actually translates to "Honest, I can write better that this!!"
:-)

Sally Derrick


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:37 PM, <p -dot- vuncanon -at- att -dot- net> wrote:

> Does anyone out there have a list of criteria they adhere to for
> beta-quality documentation?
>
> Some tech pub folks say that beta doc is merely a snapshot of the
> documentation as it stands at the beta release timeframe. Others say that
> as long as you have a Beta watermark on the beta doc than you should be
> covered. I was curious if there's a more rigorous set of criteria that
> anyone uses to decide if their doc is beta quality or not. Thanks.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
> produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
> and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
> learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
> get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
> http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as sjd1201 -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/sjd1201%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
Beta documentation quality: From: p . vuncanon

Previous by Author: RE: Screen Capture Software?
Next by Author: Re: Doc version control - in-house
Previous by Thread: RE: Beta documentation quality
Next by Thread: Re: Beta documentation quality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads