TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: I'm now blogging about Agile & TW From:"Ed" <hamonwry12 -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:"'John Posada'" <jposada99 -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:39:21 -0500
I'm not condemning anything. Marguerite supplied two URLs for the curious. I
was curious. I didn't like what I read.
I was heavily involved in an DITA implementation for a department of 40 here
in NYC. It was a fight the entire way, and I'm not even sure the company's
using DITA anymore. It was a fight to get the correct tools, it was a fight
to get implemented, it was a fight to get people to understand and use it,
and it was a fight to get output that looked even remotely like what we had
before we went that way. Plus, I had to convert and clean up the raw XML
left over from the conversion to get the doc into the new content management
system. So I know a bit of which I speak.
And as a colleague noted to me on twitter - end users don't care how your
documentation gets done.
-=Ed.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Posada [mailto:jposada99 -at- gmail -dot- com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:29 PM
> To: Ed
> Cc: Marguerite Krupp; TECHWR-L Writing; Robert Lauriston
> Subject: Re: I'm now blogging about Agile & TW
>
> You're going to condem a methodology because of wikipedia?
>
> OTOH, if you'd tried understanding and using the methodology to do
> complete releases, as I have, you might be talking from a place of
> knowledge instead of from your ,,,,
>
> Same with DITA...create multiple helps under it and your opinion might
> be worth more than the black and white bits.
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Ed <hamonwry12 -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> > I actually agree with Robert on this one. From the bit I read on
Wikipedia,
> > it sounds like a buzzword-filled methodology forced on a group of people
> > that doesn't solve most people's problems.
> >
> > Kind of like DITA.
>
>
>
> --
> John Posada
> Senior Technical Writer
> NYMetro STC President
>
> Looking for the next gig.
Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at: http://www.doctohelp.com/
Help & Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. True single- sourcing --
generate 8 different formats and as many different versions as you need
from just one project. Fast and intuitive. http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-