TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Use of Optional in instructions From:"Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com> To:"Boudreaux, Madelyn \(GE Healthcare, consultant\)" <MadelynBoudreaux -at- ge -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:30:42 -0600
Boudreaux, Madelyn wrote:
> Richard Combs wrote:
>
> >RIGHT: "To accomplish X, do A."
> >WRONG: "Do A to accomplish X."
>
> Interesting. I've always preferred the other route, on the grounds
that
> Richard's method buries the lede. The procedure is what you do, and
any
> explanation, editorializing, or notation is secondary. A user who is
> just following orders reads the DO THIS step, and skims the
explanation
> that follows; a more curious user reads it all. Users are like ornery
> horses: you can lead them to understanding, but you can't make them
> partake.
"Buries the lede"? But we're not writing news reports, inverted-pyramid
style. We're telling people how to perform a task. As others have noted,
the user who reads "Do A" and immediately does it may not be happy upon
discovering that she just "accomplish[ed] X" when she really intended to
accomplish Y.
IMHO, the critical information -- the "lede," if you want to call it
that -- amounts to this: "Dear reader, you now have a decision to make.
Do you want to accomplish X? If so, ..."
Sorry, but I thought this was TW101 since at least the 80s. If an
instruction has a qualifier, state the qualifier first so the reader can
determine whether the instruction applies.
Richard
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-