Re: The case against M$ Word

Subject: Re: The case against M$ Word
From: "Michael West" <mbwest -at- bigpond -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:00:31 +1100

> I'm preparing an executive summary as to why M$ Word is not an adequate
tool
> for software manual production and why Adobe InDesign is a superior choice
> for the task at hand. (FrameMaker is more than this company needs.)
>
> Just a few weeks ago I participated in a thread whereby a techwr-l newbie
> inquired about the tools of the trade. In that thread, there were many
> reasons given why Word is insufficient. Can someone please point me to
that
> thread, or others that support my view?


This makes no sense to me. You've already decided that Word is inadequate,
but you want someone else to tell you why it's inadequate?

I've been using Word since version 1.0 and I know of no reason why it cannot
be used to produce software manuals, or any other sort of manuals.

I have produced manuals, brochures, booklets and much else with Word -- all
of a very high quality. I know how to make Word do things that most people
don't think it can do.

If I needed to produce a large and complex set of manuals, Word would not be
my first choice. I would prefer to use FrameMaker. But if pressed, I could
make Word do what I need it to do.

What is it that you need to do that you believe Word cannot do? And have you
tried it? Or do you just slavishly follow fashionable opinion?

--
Mike West


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Previous by Author: Re: Justified versus ragged right? (take III)
Next by Author: The committee has decided you will not find this ambiguous
Previous by Thread: RE: The case against M$ Word
Next by Thread: Re: The case against M$ Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads