TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: levels of detail -- are we beyond this? From:Evelyn Lee Barney <evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net> To:"Butler, Darren J CTR USAF AFMC 584 CBSS/GBHAC" <Darren -dot- Butler -dot- ctr -at- Robins -dot- af -dot- mil> Date:Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:47:23 -0400
Yes, and cake mixes tell you to open the plastic bag and pour the mix
into a bowl before proceeding.
That said, I don't think we can ever really know (depending, maybe, on
our audience) what is a common-knowledge detail to them, and what is
not. My personal frustration with software documentation for aps that
are new to me is when they say something like: "If you'd like to perform
X function, just use the Y-enator while holding down cntr." No screen
shot, no tip as to where to find the Y-enator, let alone what it's
primary function is (and you'd assume it has a primary function that
isn't X, since it's a Y-enator, not an X-enator.) I'm particularly
delighted with this type of instruction when it turns out that the
Y-enator is in a sub-sub-sub menu of a main menu that otherwise I never
use - so know nothing about, and takes me an hour to find.
Anyway - if asked as a reader of docs what one wish I had - I'd say
"whatever you want me to know about, tell me :::where::: it is
:::first:::. Almost everything else I can figure out on my own. If given
a second wish, I'd say "if your software does not do something the
average person would likely expect it to do (my favorite example is that
Cool Edit Pro - at least my edition - is a sound editor with no volume
control. You have to control the play-back volume from your computer
media task bar, or your speakers) then say so, up front. Then there is
FrameMaker with no print preview - but now I'm babbling.
Ev
Butler, Darren J CTR USAF AFMC 584 CBSS/GBHAC wrote:
>>> Is it me, or is this kind of detail totally unnecessary in this day and age?<<
>>>
>
>
>
> You--would--be-shocked!! ≡8^@
>
>
>
> If they STILL put instructions on some shampoo bottles………
>
>
>
> Instructions:
>
> 1. Wet hair thoroughly with warm water
>
> 2. Apply a generous amount of Mr. Andre’s SuperModel-Strength, Anti-Sludge Shampoo (with kumquat & alfalfa extracts)
>
> 3. Gently Wash hair
>
> 4. Rinse
>
> 5. Repeat
>
>
>
> PLUS, they also include a phone number to call if you have any questions!
>
>
>
>
>
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial. http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-