TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Definition of Tech Writer, was STC is broken From:Mike Starr <mikestarr-techwr-l -at- writestarr -dot- com> To:Beth Agnew <beth -dot- agnew -at- senecac -dot- on -dot- ca> Date:Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:11:44 -0500
However, my point is that the consumers of our services aren't going to be as enlightened... they want somebody to *write* stuff or they want to find someone who's a *writer*. In order to guide them to technical communicators, the definition of technical communicator ought to include *writer*, *writing* or both (my preference). Until we're confident that the term *communicator* has achieved universal usage and replaced the term *writer* I think it's a disservice to those of us in the trenches to eliminate the terms from the description of what we do.
Mike
--
Mike Starr WriteStarr Information Services
Technical Writer - Online Help Developer - Technical Illustrator
Graphic Designer - Desktop Publisher - MS Office Expert
(262) 694-1028 - mike -at- writestarr -dot- com - http://www.writestarr.com
Beth Agnew wrote:
> I think the terminology does need to evolve in that direction. Employers
> look for writers or even technical writers because that's traditionally
> been the title of people who have performed those functions. It worked
> in the 20th century but is insufficient for 21st century information age
> needs. The lines are indeed blurry, but I think there are some core
> competencies that we could identify as being the hallmarks of that
> creature the Technical Communicator that other types of writers or
> communicators or technical people do not possess. If we could agree on
> those, she says idealistically, perhaps we'd have an easier time on the
> advocacy and PR side of things.
> --Beth
>
> John Hedtke wrote:
>> FWIW, we were discussing this at the January STC Board of Directors
>> meeting. We'd like to move the terminology from "technical writers"
>> to "technical communicators," in large part because we do more than
>> just write. The lines between what's business writing vs. technical
>> writing are a bit blurry, but, then, so are the lines between many
>> other similar job titles in our field.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-