Re: Replacing "master" and "slave" terminology

Subject: Re: Replacing "master" and "slave" terminology
From: John Bartol <johnbartol -at- shaw -dot- ca>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:06:41 -0700

The answer, to me, is pretty simple.

The engineer is writing the application note. Thus, the engineer is not
the audience. *He* is writing for the audience.

So... what is the terminology the *audience* will recognize? If the
audience is tech-savvy, then they're likely to understand in an instant
what is implied by 'master' and 'slave' devices. If the audience is not
tech-savvy, then you need to determine what terms *they* will recognize
or be comfortable with. The terms could possibly be one of the pairs
suggested in the list in another post, or something else entirely that
is *known* to that audience. The terms could very well be
industry-specific jargon that you/the engineer haven't come across before.

In other words... check with somebody from the target audience. It's
quite likely that master/slave won't be a problem for them. On the other
hand, they could be from a group that objects to that term, or to
'abort', and so on.

Karen Mulholland wrote:
> When two similar things - circuits, devices,
> mechanisms - are set up so that one controls the
> other, it's often called a "master-slave"
> relationship. For example, cars' brake systems have
> master cylinders and slave cylinders.
>
> I've been on the geeky end of technical communication
> for a long time, so I'm accustomed to this
> terminology.
> That doesn't necessarily mean I should use it, though;
> frankly, it makes me a little queasy.
>
> Today as I walked an engineer through an edit session
> on an application note that he's been writing, he
> volunteered that although he had referred to elements
> of his equipment setup as the "master" and "slave"
> units, he was uncomfortable with those words. He asked
> me what would be a better way to express the
> relationship.
>
> Here's the setup:
> MagicBox A and MagicBox B both communicate with
> BigDumbBox.
> The two MagicBoxes are identical. Their physical
> placement is at the discretion of the person who
> installs them. They might not even both be in the same
> room.
> BigDumbBox shouldn't be able to tell that there are
> two MagicBoxes.
> To keep BigDumbBox happy, MagicBox A controls MagicBox
> B and makes it look like all communication is between
> BigDumbBox and MagicBox A.
>
> What would you call the unit that controls the other
> one? What would you call the one that is under control
> of the first one?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
> printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
> Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
> http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
> Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
> documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as johnbartol -at- shaw -dot- ca -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/johnbartol%40shaw.ca
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
Replacing "master" and "slave" terminology: From: Karen Mulholland

Previous by Author: [Fwd: Re: For the Canadians...do I have to charge GST?]
Next by Author: Re: STC
Previous by Thread: RE: Replacing "master" and "slave" terminology
Next by Thread: RE: Replacing "master" and "slave" terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads