What are the most useful quality metrics for technical writers' projects?

Subject: What are the most useful quality metrics for technical writers' projects?
From: nospam -at- o2 -dot- pl
To: TECHWR-L -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:29:13 +0200

There is a couple of them, which are collected automatically by internal tools, like for example cost of quality, cost of poor quality, review coverage etc. Do you find them valuable in terms of tracking and improving documentation projects?

We are also about to start gathering data on productivity. Are you aware of any good practices for measuring productivity and tools helping to achieve it (preferably for xml-based content)?

Some clarification is required here to not let the discussion go astray.

1. The goal is to identify and develop a common set of metrics to be tracked that presents how well the unit is performing on an annual basis.

2. Technical writers can't be part of the software team, they work separately in teams of technical writers. Also it is not possible to limit the number of reviewers or reviews.

3. All possible mistakes in the documentation are technical (e.g. missing steps, wrong parameters, obsolete data, etc.). Only so called subject matter experts are capable of catching them, but sometimes, due to their unavailability, limited timeframe or number of reviews, the errors are missed. There are no software tools able to verify the documentation in this area.

4. Productivity is understand as "The measurement of the creation of some artifact (or service) for a level of effort over a unit of time."

Question also available on http://www.linkedin.com/answers/business-operations/project-management/OPS_PRJ/206736-10874368?browseIdx=0&sik=1207742555957&goback=%2Eamq.

Regards,
Krzysztof Kolczyk
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: STC is broken
Next by Author: RE: Collaborative tool for Readme writing
Previous by Thread: Re: OFFSHORING and the falling dollar?
Next by Thread: Search not working on Merging Chm files


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads