TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Thoughts on an Editing Portfolio? From:Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca> To:techwr-l List <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, schu1663 <schu1663 -at- umn -dot- edu> Date:Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:49:08 -0500
Danielle wondered: <<I'm currently a student in a technical
communication program and was recently thinking about portfolios.
Specifically, I was wondering what kind of things one might include
when trying to create a portfolio to show off editing skills. At
first, I was thinking that I would need to include some "before-and-
after" documents, but then I came to the conclusion that anything I
have in the portfolio will show off editing skills.>>
I've been doing this so long that I no longer worry about portfolios;
most of my work now arrives via word of mouth. Those rare times
someone wants to see what I do before committing to work with me, I
ask one or more of my clients for permission to use one of their
current manuscripts as an example. I edit exclusively on the screen,
so I can create a portfolio on the fly simply by selecting
appropriate manuscripts from my current collection; here,
"appropriate" means in a genre related to the work I'm trying to win.
My take on this is that a good editing sample should show a range of
editorial attributes:
- completeness (no significant errors remaining)
- consistency (internal, with a given style guide)
- correctness
- the ability to recognize the difference between necessary and
arbitrary corrections
- an ability to suggest improvements that are wise, even if they're
not crucial
- an ability to engage the author in dialogue through polite,
helpful, judicious comments
Lots of details on this in my book (see below).
----------------------------------------------------
-- Geoff Hart
ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca / geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com
www.geoff-hart.com
--------------------------------------------------
***Now available*** _Effective onscreen editing_
(http://www.geoff-hart.com/home/onscreen-book.htm)
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-