TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE : Re: and/or? From:Yves JEAUROND <jingting -at- rogers -dot- com> To:neilson -at- windstream -dot- net, nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:07:48 -0400 (EDT)
One goal of technical writing is to remove ambiguity and uncertainty.
"A C++ compiler or a C# compiler can be used for this code."
Regards,
YJ
neilson -at- windstream -dot- net a écrit :
Mark, language is full of well-defined expressions that
introduce or indicate ambiguity or uncertainty. "Or" itself
can reside in a true statement where it indicates missing
research: "The source code for the project is in C++ or C#."
Indeed, this example is improved slightly by replacing "or"
with "and/or" which then highlights the difficulty to those
who recognize it as a sentinel of muddy thinking.
Just in case someone doesn't see the problem, my statement
above could variously mean:
1. Either C++ or C# (but not both) will be used.
2. C++ and C# are being used together.
3. We've not decided yet, and are trying to weasel past the
two teams of design reviewers, one of which champions C++
and the other C#.
4. We are writing for management, or to meet a government spec.
5. We are testing to see if anyone's awake and reading this
stuff.
Does anyone have a counter-example, in which and/or serves
as a paragon of clarity?
--Peter Neilson
Mark L. Levinson continues to defend and/or:
> Raj wrote:
> > Technical documentation does not have any place for
> > ambiguities like "and/or".
>
> Like any expression, it can be used sloppily.
> But Merriam-Webster has no trouble defining it.
> The Microsoft Encarta dictionary has no
> trouble defining it. The American Heritage
> dictionary has no trouble defining it. If
> it's ambiguous in context, I think that's
> the fault of the writer rather than of
> the expression.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jingting -at- rogers -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-