TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
<snip>
I asked, specifically, about "structured writing" or "writing
for single source", I also mentioned that I'm more interested in how best to
shift a docs team from writing chapters, to writing distinct chunks of
information.
</snip>
>From a practical training angle, I've found that structuring a legacy "chapter" into a single-sourced version can be helpful. The trick is finding a nice chapter with distinct conceptual, task, and reference topics inherently embedded that can in fact be structured. It's also great if there is some duplicate content built in, like a common warning note or a reference table that can be pulled out.
In my last company, we set up some training using an actual chapter. It was very challenging because not all writers of this reasonably large company could analyze the content domain and figure out what to single-source.
A fellow manager suggested in the future taking something more generic and simple, like documenting a toaster! I would seriously consider it.
I just finished giving a DITA plus Epic demonstration to my product group in San Francisco last week. I took a large, well-known chapter and showed how I broke it down into structured topics, then rebuilt the content with a ditamap. I even threw in an alternate ditamap structure and a relationship table with alternate links to demonstrate the flexibility of the system. I then generated online Help, HTML, PDF, and Word builds to show how it all looked in the output.
Fortunately, the legacy chapter lent itself to many small conceptual topics, which is why I selected it. Though, I had to fake out some duplicate content like a warning note to demonstrate the single-sourced content references, plus add some task and reference material. It did the trick and the presentation was successful.
There is no doubt about it. The hands-on demonstration and training angle is essential when moving to structured documentation and single-sourced solutions.
Troy Klukewich
Information Architect
Oracle
----- Original Message ----
From: Gordon McLean <Gordon -dot- McLean -at- GrahamTechnology -dot- com>
To: Troy Klukewich <tklukewich -at- sbcglobal -dot- net>; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 12:28:45 AM
Subject: RE: Writing structured content [recap]
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-