TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Video vs The Written Word From:"Rick Stone" <rstone75 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:15:38 -0600
Hi all
Just my own personal $.02 worth (adjusted for inflation)
Just playing Devil's Advocate here, but let's just say that you are
attempting to coax the user into turning a knob that is located among a very
complex maze of other similar objects. And further, assume that nothing
currently exists in the form of photographic help. If I were the person
needing assistance with locating said knob, I would cheerfully and
gratefully appreciate ANY form of photo that simply showed me where the darn
thing was, using a callout, as opposed to reading three paragraphs of text
that explain where it may be located.
Granted, I agree that the better the photo can be, the better the end
result. But I'm not sure I'd care if the photo were along the lines of Olan
Mills or another well known studio, as long as it conveyed what I needed.
And to be totally honest, I think my gut would probably inherently make me
trust a more "basic" photo than one that was meticulously laid out and all
color coordinated under perfect lighting. As I would somehow think that this
was probably captured under "real" circumstances.
I'm not suggesting anyone settle for shoddy work. Only offering a
potentially differing viewpoint from an end user point of view.
As for videos, I see it this way. Perhaps you have a series of steps that
might take two to three HTML pages to perform. But if you could keep the
user on the same page without having to read and click to see the next page
of information, the focus may be better retained. Additionally, from what I
understand, people are more enticed to watch a video, where they will simply
balk at a pile of written instructions. Sometimes a disconnect can occur
when reading, where if they are actually watching a process be performed it
is more engaging.
I do agree with the fact that one cannot print the steps from a video to
take with them. But I believe that if a bit of care is taken, the addition
of video can be invaluable. As for video, I'd say it should be supplemental.
Written material should also be provided. I think of it like that FedEx
commercial where the employee suggests something. A pause occurs. Then the
boss makes the same suggestion as the employee did. People may connect more
easily with video than simple written text, or vice-versa.
Cheers... Rick :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dori Green" <dgreen -at- associatedbrands -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: Video vs The Written Word
My biggest problem with video is the same problem I have with photos:
Looks great, sounds great, works great -- if it's done right. Too many
people at high levels think that minimal is okay, and I have serious
professional difficulties about having my name associated with shoddy
work.
When I'm told to take photos out in the factory with a point-and-shoot
digital camera, and no additional lighting equipment, without proper
editing
software, it's another gosh-darn educational opportunity.
I explain how this will be perfectly adequate for the storyboard, and I
ask
if they've already located a qualified professional to prepare the
finished
product. It's a losing battle, but I continue to fight the good fight.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com