TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Does the paper reference prior work by any of
Chung, F.R.K. Salehi, J.A. Wei, V.K.
or any other papers that might deal with
optical orthogonal codes or other fields within
statistics? If so, then the terminology is exact,
and needs no changes. Indeed, it admits none.
I merely googled for (no quotes)
code with length n and weight k
and noticed that it brought up a bunch of IEEE papers,
which I cannot view because I'm not an IEEE member.
If you are a member, or have a friend who is, then you
can read the papers that Google brings up. I suspect that
you have bumped into yet another case where mathematicians
have purloined perfectly good words and put them into
service as mathematical terminology. Mathematicians
regard the practise as poetry, or at least poetic
license. Editors are annoyed.
>
> From: Karen Hallman <hallmanedits -at- yahoo -dot- com>
> Date: 2006/12/29 Fri AM 05:33:16 EST
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: USAGE: weight of code
>
> Hi, All.
> I'm an editor, not a techwriter. I rarely edit in-depth discussions of code. I have a journal paper that briefly goes into some specifics about code construction. The authors write:
> ...MIZ code with length n and weight k can be constructed...
> and later on:
> ...we named the code MIZ(r,k,n).
> Can a code have a weight? Is this the same as "rank"?
> My authors are from China, but this paper will appear in an American journal, so I need the more common term for a U.S. audience. Any thoughts?
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-