Re: question about copyrights and "open" standards.

Subject: Re: question about copyrights and "open" standards.
From: Lou Quillio <public -at- quillio -dot- com>
To: Matthew Kaster <matthewkaster -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:38:08 -0400

Matthew Kaster wrote:
> The board is based on a form factor that (I've been
> told) is an "Open" standard.

Hi Matthew,

What is that form factor, already? We might be over-thinking.

Here's the most common desktop mobo these days:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATX

Here are the rest:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motherboard

These configurations tend to have non-proprietary births. Somebody
(like Intel or VIA) proposes a new standard configuration because it
would better accommodate their components. They don't plan to make
mobos, rather their lives would be easier and they'd sell more
product if more mobos were "designed like this".

Think of it another way. Mobos are at the bottom of the food chain.
They don't wag anything. They're commoditized. Leaving aside
laptops, here's what *doesn't* happen: (1) innovative mobo maker
proposes new proprietary standard; (2) CPU, peripherals, and cabling
makers all clamber and re-tool to accommodate the exciting new mobo,
forsaking others. Doesn't happen.

I don't think it'll take a team of lawyers -- or even one -- to
learn how _your_ form factor came to be, and establish that nobody's
paying royalties.

Doesn't mean your guy isn't ripping-off somebody's tech in another
area, but you simply don't need anybody's permission to manufacture
mobos to, say, the ATX spec. If you did, that would actually be
*bad* for the makers of the higher-margin components used with them
-- and they don't want that.

You know, these things are made in Asia for real cheap. If your guy
is North American ... don't buy any stock.

Another thing: if you write your mobo docs in some sort of
intellectual-property clean room you'll be the only one who does.

Hey, you know what? Forget what I said. In fact, I own the spec to
those mobos you're making. But I'm reasonable. How 'bout a buck a
board for my end? Get back with me.

LQ
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
question about copyrights and "open" standards.: From: Matthew Kaster

Previous by Author: Re: Best Free PDF Utility for Windows ... Again?
Next by Author: Re: Do you edit with your mouth open?
Previous by Thread: Re: question about copyrights and "open" standards.
Next by Thread: RE: Question about copyrights and "open" standards.


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads