TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Reviewers who don't review From:Stuart Burnfield <sburnf -at- au1 -dot- ibm -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:42:22 +0800
Ed D'Souza said:
> 4. Other people, whoever they were, presumably had access to the
> software, should have reviewed the guide and caught the error. They
> didn't, but they signed off on the doc as being technically accurate.
Perhaps you could change your sign-off sheet to have three options:
[ ] Reviewed and approved
[ ] Approved, not reviewed
[ ] Reviewed, not approved