Re: Reviewers who don't review

Subject: Re: Reviewers who don't review
From: Stuart Burnfield <sburnf -at- au1 -dot- ibm -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:42:22 +0800

Ed D'Souza said:
> 4. Other people, whoever they were, presumably had access to the
> software, should have reviewed the guide and caught the error. They
> didn't, but they signed off on the doc as being technically accurate.

Perhaps you could change your sign-off sheet to have three options:

[ ] Reviewed and approved
[ ] Approved, not reviewed
[ ] Reviewed, not approved

Signed: ________________________ Date: __ / __ / __


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Contract for a book
Next by Author: Price of poor instructions: the Cutter case
Previous by Thread: Re: Reviewers who don't review
Next by Thread: RE: Reviewers who don't review

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads