Re: [WAS] Move from Ventura to FrameMaker wise? [IS NOW] Save as vs. Print to PDF

Subject: Re: [WAS] Move from Ventura to FrameMaker wise? [IS NOW] Save as vs. Print to PDF
From: "Fred Ridder" <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: peter -at- knowhowpro -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:17:11 -0400

This is exactly the approach we use in our group.

The one gotcha is that the Watched Folder feature is only available
In Acrobat Professional; the Standard version does not support
watched folders.

Also note that the Acrobat EULA specifically prohibits creating
watched folders on a network drive or any other location that is
accessible to other computers because that effectively makes it
a multi-user installation of a single-user product.

My opinions only; I don;t speak for Intel.
Fred Ridder
Intel
Parsippany, NJ



From: Peter Gold <peter -at- knowhowpro -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: [WAS] Move from Ventura to FrameMaker wise? [IS NOW] Save as vs. Print to PDF
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:57:25 -0500

There's no need to risk the problems that Shlomo and others note in Save As > PDF, just because printing to PDF seems to take longer.

Search Acrobat help for "Watched Folder." You print a PostScript file into a watched folder that invokes Distiller and applies a specific .joboptions settings file to the PDF conversion. You can create different watched folders for different PDF results, such as press, smallest file, etc.

Because your concern is the processing time difference, while the processing time is the same for a watched folder and manually running Distiller, authors can return to work as soon as the PostScript file print job is complete - the watched folder mechanism takes over the work.

If you need to create several different PDF qualities, you may save time in the long run with watched folders, by moving the single PostScript file into the In folder of each watched folder whose output you need. It's probably possible to automate this "multiple handoff" process with some kind of scripting tools.

I recommend printing to a PS file and distilling (using the Adobe PDF
driver). Printing to the PDF port (i.e. having the 'print to file'
un-checked) also has issues with cross-file links. In the systems I use,
the speed of printing & distilling vs Save as PDF or printing to the PDF
Port seems similar.

Shlomo Perets

HTH
________________
Regards,

Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: [WAS] Move from Ventura to FrameMaker wise? [IS NOW] Save as vs. Print to PDF: From: Peter Gold

Previous by Author: RE: Acronyms, abbreviations and initialism
Next by Author: RE: Frame's graphics "tool"
Previous by Thread: Re: [WAS] Move from Ventura to FrameMaker wise? [IS NOW] Save as vs. Print to PDF
Next by Thread: MAPICS?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads