Re: Friday Poll Idea (WAS: In love with a word)

Subject: Re: Friday Poll Idea (WAS: In love with a word)
From: "H. Christopher Christner" <cchris -at- toptechwriter -dot- us>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:58:55 -0500

I always wanted to use "highly non-inflammable"

But I was afraid that doing so would put the universe in a "cat state".

--Chris


> On 1/6/06 11:51 AM, "Cynthia Schultz" <Cynthia -dot- Schultz -at- iolo -dot- com> wrote:
>
>> ubiquitous
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: techwr-l-bounces+cynthia -dot- schultz=iolo -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+cynthia -dot- schultz=iolo -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
>> Behalf Of Nuckols, Kenneth M
>> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:11 AM
>> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>> Subject: Friday Poll Idea (WAS: In love with a word)
>>
>>
>> Dick Marguils wrote:
>>>
>>> Kevin Amery wrote:
>>>> Wherefore art thou inscribing "till" upon thy software treatise?
>> These
>>> are
>>>> but wild and whirling words.
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Until next time....
>>>>
>>>> Kevin Amery
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, not all tech writing consists of software documentation. But
>> I'll
>>> let that slide. I never said I would use the word in technical writing
>>> at all. I was just trying to correct a misapprehension, which seems to
>>> be prevalent among the people who have contributed to the thread, that
>>> till can only be a verb having to do with turning the soil or a noun
>>> representing a cash drawer and that 'til is what you write when you
>> mean
>>> until and want to say it informally.
>>>
>>
>> Okay so my question for this lovely Friday morning is this: Now that
>> we've been talking about words that _other_ writers are in love with and
>> overuse, misuse, abuse, and flog incessantly in their documentation,
>> what about looking in the mirror: What word (or words) are _you_ tempted
>> to use in your documentation? Which word would just love to find a way
>> to use at least once on every page of every document you create?
>>
>> I'll go first -- I have many, but my top three are as follows:
>> - frumious
>> - brillig
>> - momeraths
>>
>> Okay, who else wants to confess? Happy Friday all!
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is
>> privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you
>> are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender
>> immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy
>> it.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Friday Poll Idea (WAS: In love with a word): From: Cynthia Schultz

Previous by Author: Re: saving trees (printing)
Next by Author: Gender neutrality and the multiple-personality third-person pronoun
Previous by Thread: RE: Friday Poll Idea (WAS: In love with a word)
Next by Thread: Re: Friday Poll Idea (WAS: In love with a word)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads