TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: who vs that From:"Nuckols, Kenneth M" <Kenneth -dot- Nuckols -at- mybrighthouse -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:21:45 -0400
Claire said...
>
> How about a *definitive* source, such as Garner's Modern American
Usage
> (or even Strunk and White)?
>
> Garner says: (page 836, section D)
> "Who is the relative pronoun for human beings (though that is also
> acceptable); that and which are the relative pronouns for anything
other
> than humans, including entities created by humans."
>
Okay this debate reminds me of another word choice issue that always
drives me batty when I hear it. It's probably not "wrong" but it sure
sounds incorrect to my ears.
It's the "called" vs. "named" issue.
Example:
"The CEO was called John Smith." Any time I read something like this
where a person is "called" and then it lists their name, it just sounds
so wrong and ignorant. I would argue that there's no option, exception,
or exemption for not writing or saying it as "The CEO was NAMED John
Smith."
I would argue that when referring to people "called" should never be
used when referring to a person's name; it should only be used when
giving some descriptive character ("called brave," "called brash"), or
nickname ("called Skippy by his college chums"). The funny thing is, it
doesn't bother me when I hear the reverse--such as using "named" with a
title or honorarium. An example of that might be, "...whom Time magazine
named Person of the Year."
But is this just one reader's/listener's prejudice, or is there really
some rule as to when you should use "called" or "named" when referring
to someone and giving their name, a nickname, a character trait, or some
sort of title or honorarium?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.