Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?

Subject: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
From: HBacheler -at- aol -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:01:16 EDT


I would like to mention that extensions came before Microsoft (I think)

If I remember rightly, AT&T (Bell Labs, BellCore) in implementing UNIX
established some early 'practices' of standardization.

In UNIX, and the "C" programming language, (circa the '70's) there are a
number of 'standard' extensions.

To name several ( believe the translations are correct):

doc c, (Code)
dot h, (Heading)
dot s, dot src (Source)
dot obj (Object)
dot bin (Binary)

Harry


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Syntax preferences
Next by Author: Re: Where do you place the Glossary hyperlink?
Previous by Thread: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Next by Thread: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads