TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Subject:RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered? From:"Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Sun, 21 Aug 2005 02:00:36 -0400
>
> - A third poster complains that OpenOffice.org lacked some features in
> MS Word. Unless she is talking about a grammar checker or some of the
> reference and collaborative features found in the Tools menu -- which
> seems unlikely in context -- I can state categorically that she is
> wrong. Presumably, she has not familiarized herself with the
> software to
> find where the functions she wanted were located.
>
What I meant was that is was disconcerting to have a program try so hard to
be *like* Word in many things and then suddenly go off that track and do
something utterly different and ultimately not as well. Just the other day
on this list there was a query about a feature that OO just doesn't have (I
can't recall at the moment what it was).
> I believe that she is closer to the mark when she goes on to
> call to say
> that it isn't intuitive. However, since we do not live in a world of
> Platonic absolutes, no such thing as intuitive software exists. People
> who use the term usually mean "familiar." Since she continues by
> complaining that it doesn't do things the way that MS Word does, I
> suspect that this is the sense in which this poster is using it.
>
I used it for about two months, and I was not at all sorry to stop using it.
Yes, for a "competitor" to mimic Word so faithfully in many things and then
*not* do some things the MS way is rather a pain in the patootie to someone
who just opened it and began using it. I would never work with OO if I had a
choice. In many ways, it just was inferior. But I'm primarily an editor, so
that may be part of the problem for me.
Bonnie Granat | http://www.GranatEdit.com
bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com
Cambridge, Massachusetts, US
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.