Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?

Subject: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:22:46 -0700


This may be the reason why OS apps have not been satisfying to me.
In my experience, programmers may be great at making things happen
in an app, but they're terrible at determining what things should happen.
I don't *want* programs I use to be loaded with features that are in
there because someone decided they'd "just be really cool." In fact,
that's my biggest gripe about many of the corporate apps I've had to
use in the past - they're tending to move away from being tools designed
to do one thing really well and toward having everything but the kitchen
sink in them because nobody is in charge of deciding what the target
function is, keeping the development focused on that target and keeping
out stuff that someone wants to add just because it'd be "really cool."
IOW, corporate apps are starting to look more and more like OS ones.
Their developers all need someone with a clear vision to "tell them what to do."

My successes in using non-corporate software has been in the world of
shareware, where often an entire program is the result of one person's
desire and determination to create something that will do one thing well.

Gene Kim-Eng



----- Original Message ----- From: "David Castro" <thejavaguy -at- gmail -dot- com>

A third, and from what I have seen fairly common, incentive is that
programmers get to help run the show. They're frusturated with being
told what to do, even when they know that there are features that
would really help (or yes, just be really cool) that they can't get
the go-ahead to implement. Getting into FOSS, you can (usually) choose
what you want to work on, work on it when you want to, and for how
long you want to. That sense of self-management offsets the feeling of
being a grunt at your "day-job." There's also a sense of real
collaboration of equals, rather than the dominating "collaboration"
that goes on in a typical software company, in which management can
still override a good (or cool) idea.




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.12/77 - Release Date: 8/18/2005


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?: From: Nuckols, Kenneth M
RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?: From: Bruce Byfield
Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?: From: David Castro

Previous by Author: Re: Adobe Professional glitch driving me crazy
Next by Author: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Previous by Thread: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Next by Thread: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads