TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Subject:Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered? From:Brian Gordon <elasticsoul2003 -at- yahoo -dot- ca> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:57:10 -0400 (EDT)
Well, I'll provide another reason. Many of us are the
lone TW at a company. Unless I know a tool very well,
I do not want to recommend it. It's a personal risk,
especially when I haven't been in a position very
long, and it's a risk to the project, especially one
with tight deadlines and budgets.
Previous project, for example, I was asked to
recommend a product for creating interactive training
courses. I selected Norpath Elements Studio, a
commercial product that turned out to be incredibly
buggy. I was trying to save the company I was
contracted to a bit of money. Instead, deadlines
slipped and my reputation suffered (as did my stress
level!). I would have been better, in that situation,
to pick a known-good product like Macromedia
Authorware.
Now: new project, new company, and I have to choose an
authoring tool to create help. My first choice was the
industry leader, RoboHelp. The only reason I
ultimately selected AuthorIT was because the future of
RH is uncertain, and many people whose opinion I
respect on this and other lists suggested AIT.
So far, so good, but it was still a professional risk
for me, and not the type I like to take. I would
rather be suggesting better ways to present
information, to educate the users, and so on, not
risking future contracts and a recommendation based on
my best guess as to which software to use.
To be candid, I could have selected RH and nobody
would have blamed me if it didn't work - just as
nobody will congratulate me if the software I choose
does work. However, you can be damn sure I would be in
for it if the non-industry-standard tool I selected
caused project problems.
When I was an employee, I had time to experiment with
new software on company time. As an independent, any
such playing about must be done on my own time.
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.