RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?

Subject: RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
From: "Sarah Stegall" <siliconwriter -at- comcast -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:02:55 -0700


Bonnie Granat writes:
- Its Help is about as bad as Word's.


Hah. You should see the user guide. Sentence fragments, missing punctuation,
non-standard sentence structure, misspelled words, random character
formatting and the pervasive use of the passive voice are only a few of its
flaws. Not to mention being over 400 pages long.

I veritably itch to rewrite it. :)
Sarah



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Next by Author: RE: Silly question on Word Styles
Previous by Thread: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Next by Thread: RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads