Re: Is this some obscure but correct terminology?

Subject: Re: Is this some obscure but correct terminology?
From: John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 06:41:11 -0700 (PDT)


Thanks, Jerry...yes, the developers I'm working with are that kind of
people and the documentation I'm writing is for their internal use.

You are the second person to validate the existence term, though I
have a feeling that the usage of the term as she is using it is
somewhat off. I'll be discussing this content with the developer to
apply the term correctly, not replace the term. Thanks.

> It's a very secret-handshake thing, used by
> Java-object-XML-framework people
> ....
> Unless your audience is specifically these people, try for a more
> dramatistic and less techno-geek phrasing.


John Posada
Senior Technical Writer

"What do we want? More than
anybody else has."
Steve Ballmer

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: Is this some obscure but correct terminology?: From: Jerry Muelver

Previous by Author: RE: What do people work from - more -> Agile
Next by Author: Re: Certification--a new concept. Discuss.
Previous by Thread: Re: Is this some obscure but correct terminology?
Next by Thread: Re: Is this some obscure but correct terminology?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads