Re: marketing problem (was Leprosy?)

Subject: Re: marketing problem (was Leprosy?)
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:43:11 -0400


I think your reasoning for not using it fits the reason why it was
used in the first place.

Oh well. I saw nothing wrong with the subject line. Perhaps if it
offends you should contact the original poster about it.

On 5/17/05, James Jones <doc-x -at- earthlink -dot- net> wrote:
>
> Thanks David. No, I don't believe people need to check every piece of
> language to make sure it does not offend, but 'Leprosy' in particular is
> a very bad disease and there is probably no one on this list who can
> stand up for people who have the disease.
> As to the 'draw' of the word. A more precise description of the
> problem might have been in order.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
re: marketing problem (was Leprosy?): From: James Jones

Previous by Author: Re: Leprosy?
Next by Author: Re: Techwriter Justification
Previous by Thread: re: marketing problem (was Leprosy?)
Next by Thread: Re: marketing problem (was Leprosy?)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads