[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Department of redundancy department

Subject: Re: Department of redundancy department
From: Lou Quillio <public -at- quillio -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:25:34 -0400


Eva Whitley wrote:

From a document my collegue is editing: "Each switch is populated with
various modules. In some instances, these modules are redundant and in
other instances they are not redundant."

So, is this statement redundant?

There's a strong argument here for sleeping at the switch switch.

[Friday, baby.]

LQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Department of redundancy department: From: Eva Whitley

Previous by Author: Re: LONG - A colloquial writing style?
Next by Author: Re: A newbie question relevant to recent discussions on the divide between engineers and writers
Previous by Thread: Department of redundancy department
Next by Thread: RE: Department of redundancy department

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads