RE: Technical Writing with LaTeX

Subject: RE: Technical Writing with LaTeX
From: "Fred Ridder" <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:54:44 -0400


Probably because many technical writers recognize that producing
documents that are accurate, complete, usable, and timely is more
important to the business reasons for documents than producing
"beautiful books". This is particularly true when the technical
information are delivered electronically rather than as printed books.
It's more important to use tools that allow the generation of
navigation and accessibility aids (e.g. hyperlinked ToC and index)
in our deliverables, that facilitate reuse and repurposing of
information, and that don't inhibit the ongoing revision and
expansion of information that is continually evolving. Most of
us don't need tools that are focused on producing a beautiful
but static fossil record of information.

LaTeX may be a wonderful tool for typesetting printed books
like academic titles that get published once. But many technical
writers (particulalry those who document software) need to
produce new editions of documents once or twice a year to
support new releases of their product. (One of my own
information deliverables has been expanded and republished
six times in the last year and a half as more and more features
have been implemented.) What is needed in these cases is
an industrial-strength authoring tool (probably coupled with
content management) rather than a fine typesetting tool.

My opinion only; I don't speak for Intel
Fred Ridder
Intel
Parsippany, NJ

From: Isaac Waisberg <ibergus -at- gmail -dot- com>
Reply-To: Isaac Waisberg <ibergus -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Subject: Technical Writing with LaTeX
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:54:39 +0100


Hi;

I find LaTeX an amazing tool and I often wonder why is it neglected by
technical writers. The main motivation for its development was the
need to present technical information clearly and beautifully. In
Knuth's words, TeX is a ``typesetting system intended for the creation
of beautiful books---and especially for books with a lot of
mathematics.''

I found very few references to LaTeX in techwr-l among them: ``LaTeX,
a professional typesetting program, is free software, but, like
QuarkExpress, is a poor choice for documents that will be frequently
revised'' (http://tinyurl.com/69nx9).

Why do you think LaTeX is neglected by technical writers?

Isaac

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Weird Word 2003 Problem - just "upgraded"
Next by Author: RE: Do you log on or logon to a website?
Previous by Thread: RE: Technical Writing with LaTeX
Next by Thread: RE: Technical Writing with LaTeX


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads