Re: OT Criticizing writers (was Technical Writing - What's the catch?)
Just because I am not a professionally trained career counselor does not
mean that I do not have the right to spot a moron being a moron and call
them on it.
Careful, Kelly! There is a Fat Bright Line between saying that a piece of writing stinks and saying that the person who wrote it is a moron. The first is focused on the Thing and it is defensible as an opinion you're entitled to, even if some people take offense at the existence of critical commentary. The second is focused on the Person, and can be interpreted as defamatory and hence actionable.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
References:
RE: OT Criticizing writers (was Technical Writing - What's the catch?): From: Oja, W. Kelly
Previous by Author:
Re: Taking credit
Next by Author:
Re: Academic Research in TechComm (Was RE: Criticizing Writers - What Would You Have Done?)
Previous by Thread:
RE: OT Criticizing writers (was Technical Writing - What's the catch?)
Next by Thread:
RE: OT Criticizing writers (was Technical Writing - What's the catch?)
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads