Re: Document review process? (take II)

Subject: Re: Document review process? (take II)
From: Amanda_Abelove -at- toyota -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:07:54 -0800

Plus it has this horrible dog-ate-my-homework effect where it loses a
couple of hours worth of work, randomly!!! Ugh. May I never do docs in
Word on a Novell network again!

Amanda


bounce-techwr-l-201086 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com wrote on 03/02/2005 10:47:53 AM:

>
> > rather than Frame) because it works, and works extremely well. Word
> > is
> > the best word processor going; Frame kicks ass for document layout.
> > Why not take advantage of their respective strengths?
>
> Because I reject that opinion of Word? It's flaky, unstable,
> impossible to inforce style structure, a file size pig, etc.
>
>
> =====
> John Posada
> Senior Technical Writer
>
> âNever be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone
> amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built
> the Titanic.â - Dave Barry
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
> Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
> http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
> Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and
> unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews
for Word
> and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
> http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Doc-To-Help 7.5 Professional: New version with new features,
> improved performance and reliability, plus much more! Download your
> free trial today at www.componentone.com/techwrlfeb.
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
> Amanda_Abelove -at- toyota -dot- com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-techwr-l-201086O -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
>
>

X -at- V9’ƒ@,4 -at- 1!0

 E‘1 ÑÇ•êëÚºg§¶XŸyÌ•ìî'–)Þ+ºË¢{ÛŠ«ž}ç§$™©Úé×¥¦âbzÅ–)¢µçø­ë ¢µ¨­ÖtZÚãêخ½ê)ÞéÛÿüŠä&þׇ
å w¥§¾O®‡Þȝ©M{ ÞÈŸ­†w°}æ·¬Šjk¢÷ß¹šÇÚ–&›ŠX­Ên²kœ†j+x:0žZw*.­új[hu¬š· 0r‰©¢w§¶‰Þ‰¿µç¹_y¶(¹ªÞê{eÊ›±Êmçׇ
å«r¯z»^r+•ÊN‹§²æ¸›zÇu¦å™¨¥¶‰^j÷p®]yÛûËr+•ÊIéÙž+-­«b½êË¢{-¢X¬jׇ
啊ȆÛÿü
念ç«—÷+z·¬¢êÆv)ß


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Document review process? (take II): From: John Posada

Previous by Author: RE: Part of QA WAS: Software Development Documents
Next by Author: Re: Configurable On-Line Documentation: Tools and Technologies
Previous by Thread: Re: Document review process? (take II)
Next by Thread: RE: Document review process? (take II)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads