Re: Capitalizing...research need

[David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>]

Gene,

FYI, I have *not* taken IM training. I have, however, read through
quite a bit of theory about it and have seen some projects done that
were very interesting.

In my view, procedural documentation is a prime candidate for this
kind of process.

However, I am certainly not a missionary of any sort regarding it. I
tend to use the best ideas I can find for the job at hand.

David

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:20:37 -0800, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> My experience with IM is that there are definitely some ideas there
> worth implementing.  What concerns me about it is the tendency of
> people I have met who have taken the training to sound a bit like
> Scientologists when they talk about it...
> 
> Gene Kim-Eng
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 7.5 Professional: New version with new features, improved performance and reliability, plus much more!  Download your free trial today at www.componentone.com/techwrlfeb.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.