Re: Why don't more job interviews use writing tests?

Subject: Re: Why don't more job interviews use writing tests?
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:55:01 -0800


The only time in my career that I was ever asked to take a writing
test it turned out to really be a "tool test" (FrameMaker and Viso),
consisting of a few pages of a "document" with corrupted grammar
and graphics and 45 minutes to "rewrite" it all. Unfortunately, the
company's document template was so screwed up you could not
have produced a decent document from it without first repairing
the template (their previous writer had walked off the job, so there
was nobody in-house to explain their document problems to). It
should have been15 minutes of editing/recomposition and 20 minutes
of Visio illustration, but it needed at least an hour of FM template
reconstruction (no, I didn't get the job, but that turned out to be a
good thing).

I still rank references as #1 when it comes to evaluating skills. I've
never hired a writer who came with good ones and then disappointed
me.

Gene Kim-Eng



"Chuck Martin" <cm -at- writeforyou -dot- com> wrote in message news:...
>
> This question occurred to me recently. In all the interviews I've had
> over the years, in just one was I ever asked to take a writing test
> right there. (In that case, I was shown a section of existing
> documentation, asked some questions about the product, and was given 30
> minutes to rewrite the content. I got that job.)


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 7.5 Professional: New version with new features, improved performance and reliability, plus much more! Download your free trial today at www.componentone.com/techwrlfeb.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Question on Naming: From: Oja, W. Kelly

Previous by Author: Re: Typeface for Callout Boxes
Next by Author: Re: Dress for Success - Conclusion
Previous by Thread: Question on Naming
Next by Thread: RE: Question on Naming


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads