ADMIN Re: Need to Be Cheery: Was something else

Subject: ADMIN Re: Need to Be Cheery: Was something else
From: Lisa M. Bronson <lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:00:26 -0600


This thread is no longer related to technical communication, so it's time to get back to the topic of the list.

Thanks,
Lisa B.


On Feb 5, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Tony Markos wrote:


John Posada wrote:

Passing [people] in a hallway without being cheery
does not validate that there is a problem.

Tony Markos responds:

Try attending a typical evengalical church with that
belief. Ouch! And, just ask George W, this is a very
rapidly growing group - with alot of influence.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 7.5 Professional: New version with new features, improved performance and reliability, plus much more! Download your free trial today at www.componentone.com/techwrlfeb.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Need to Be Cheery: Was something else: From: Tony Markos

Previous by Author: ADMIN Interview requests
Next by Author: New TECHWR-L Poll Question - Degrees
Previous by Thread: Re: Need to Be Cheery: Was something else
Next by Thread: RE: Contracting (an off-shoot from "Closed Group of Writers)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads